Mr. Moon,
Your position is well stated and sound. So please do not construe my rebuttal as "Slamming you".
1) Our position is not active, proactive or reactive law enforcement roles for the the good of public safety. We are recovery contractor's hired to perform a service in a civil matter. Very similar to repo personnel who are hired to recover vehicles, construction equipment, boats, etc.
2) In most states, if you are in any way affiliated with an LE agency, you are prohibited by state laws from engaging in BEA work. So you are fortunate that MI. allows you to do this. 1 of our jails just fired 3 jailers for doing BEA work in thier off time.
3) Then you get into colour of law issues, search warrants, etc.
4) If you carry some sort of an ID card and present it upon first contact with your skip or co-signer, present yourself in a professional manner, explain who and what you are and why you are there, then there shouldn't be any kind of confusion regarding your apprehension.
5) Attire/Equipment: I have, as well as others, written many, many articles on this topic. Not every single apprehension you go on is a high risk one, therefore negating the "SWAT" routine. Granted, on high risk cases yes, do so. But on your ordinary, run of the mill non-violent dui skip regular street clothes suffice. Now, having said all of this, I will wear on occasion, a BEA t-shirt with reflective lettering on it if working at night, for safety and identification reasons.
Additionally, alot of cases require surveillance. How can you utilize "Urban Camoflauge" if you are tacked out like a cop ?
6) 1 of the main reasons for being so strict on attire and equipment is because of the LE community itself. They don't like it (generally speaking), they don't want it, and they are the ones we have to get along with. Like the saying goes, "When in Rome...."
7) I do agree with you that when percieved as some kind of LEO the cooperation increases; but that can also backfire if they are experienced with the laws themselves and start demanding search warrants, asking for Miranda rights, or thier lawyer. etc.
Lastly, ours is not a new process of arrest. Rather it is an extension of the original arrest by the initiating LE agency. So that is why I use the term "apprehension" or "recovery" as oposed to "arrest". I do not "arrest" anyone. Only LEO's can do that and in some cases citizens, but that's another discussion.
I hope my views will help to clear up some of your questions.
Stay safe, take care, and God Bless.