Mindtracker wrote:
I'm just curious..who says it is controversial ?
I believe that was me.
Mindtracker wrote:
How do you know who agrees and who doesn't ?
I don't, but then again, I didn't claim to.
Mindtracker wrote:
What is the empirical data you make this all-knowing, all commanding, authoritative statement "Some agree, many don't..." ? Did you run a poll ? If so I didn't see it.
Empirical data that people disagree? The fact that you and I are having this conversation proves that people disagree and it is therefore controversial. Polls, of course, aren't releative to much of anything.
Mindtracker wrote:
You are new here, where as I am not. You have made only a few posts, where as I have made hundreds. Perhaps you are not familiar with the old addage " When in Rome...". The norm for this community is to not constantly quote from 1 post immediately to the next one. That is being totally redundant.
I've noticed that some people seem to think it's a badge of honor how many posts they have or how much material they can cut n paste in each. Seems to me that it should be the quality of what you write that matters. But that it is only my opinion.
Mindtracker wrote:
A word of advice to you Mr. Baldwin if you wish to be counted as a professional here would be to come across a little less as a know it all.
I call them like I see them, ilke it or lump it. Since I'm still a student, it's pretty obvious that I don't know everything. The more I learn, the more I know how much I don't know.