Fugitive Recovery Network (FRN)
https://ftp.fugitiverecovery.com/forum/

Active Denial Technology
https://ftp.fugitiverecovery.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=9954
Page 1 of 1

Author:  speezack [ Mon 27 Apr 2009 19:57 ]
Post subject:  Active Denial Technology

Anyone comes across one of these???????

Wouldn't it be nice to have a hand held one to augment your taser...

Active Denial Technology uses a transmitter to send a narrow beam of 95-GHz millimeter waves towards an identified subject. Traveling at the speed of light, the energy reaches the subject and penetrates less than 1/64 of an inch into the skin, quickly heating up the skin's surface. The 95-GHz energy penetrates 1/64 inch into the skin and produces an intense burning sensation that stops when the transmitter is switched off or when the individual moves out of the beam. Within seconds, an individual feels an intense heating sensation that stops when the transmitter is shut off or when the individual moves out of the beam. According to reports, a 2-second burst from the system can heat the skin to a temperature of 130° F. At 50 °C, the pain reflex makes people pull away automatically in less than a second. Someone would have to stay in the beam for 250 seconds before it burnt the skin,

Despite the sensation, the technology does not cause injury because of the low energy levels used. It exploits a natural defense mechanism that helps to protect the human body from damage. The heat-induced sensation caused by this technology, is nearly identical to the sensation experienced by briefly touching an ordinary light bulb that has been left on for a while. Unlike a light bulb, however, active denial technology will not cause rapid burning, because of the shallow penetration of the beam and the low levels of energy used. The transmitter needs only to be on for a few seconds to cause the sensation.

Image

The technology was developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Department of Defense's Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate. Approximately $40 million has been spent on this technology over the past ten years.

In July 2005 it was reported that the Active Denial System would be deployed to Iraq before the end of the year. Under an initiative called Project Sheriff, troops will receive a total of 15 vehicles. These deployments did not take place, and as of early 2007 the initial deployment was slated no sooner than 2010.

This non-lethal technology was developed in response to Department of Defense needs for field commanders to have options short of the use of deadly force. Non-lethal technologies can be used for protection of Defense resources, peacekeeping, humanitarian missions and other situations in which the use of lethal force is undesirable. The system is intended to protect military personnel against small-arms fire, which is generally taken to mean a range of 1,000 meters. The system is described as having a range of 700 yards.

Countermeasures against the weapon could be quite straightforward — for example covering up the body with thick clothes or carrying a metallic sheet — or even a trash can lid — as a shield or reflector. Also unclear is how the active-denial technology would work in rainy, foggy or sea-spray conditions where the beam's energy could be absorbed by water in the atmosphere.

Two primary organizations are executing this program: the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate at Quantico Marine Corps Base, Virginia, and the Air Force Research Laboratory, headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. The Air Force Research Laboratory is developing the technology with funding from both the Air Force and the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate.

Author:  SpanielPI [ Mon 27 Apr 2009 20:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: Active Denial Technology

$40 million dollars of our tax money wasted.......reminds me of all the money the Military wasted on the Bradley fighting vehicle.

Author:  SnoWolf [ Tue 28 Apr 2009 04:33 ]
Post subject:  Re: Active Denial Technology

RWB wrote:
$40 million dollars of our tax money wasted.......reminds me of all the money the Military wasted on the Bradley fighting vehicle.


This is technology that works, however. I have seen it demonstrated, many times and been "jacked up" by it twice. It is every bit as effective as a Taser, yet it has a longer range. Believe me when I say, your whole agenda changes when your skin feels like it is boiling.

Author:  SpanielPI [ Tue 28 Apr 2009 08:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Active Denial Technology

I wasn't questioning if it works....I was questionng its cost/benefit ratio.

Author:  SnoWolf [ Tue 28 Apr 2009 08:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: Active Denial Technology

Oh...I definately agree. But what can we expect when a hammer costs $300 and a toilet seat has been listed as costing $1200. One panel, from the side of a A-4 "training jet" costs (according to government documents and a conversation {a butt chewing , more accurately} that I heard) in excess of $300,000....but why? Government stuff is always the most expensive you can find.

Author:  Mdbtyhtr [ Tue 28 Apr 2009 17:44 ]
Post subject:  Re: Active Denial Technology

Government procurement practices raise the cost of everything. There is a standards committee that establishes an acceptable specification for an item. Then there is a team that creates testing procedures and acceptability standards, then the tests have to be run on all the submitted products from potential suppliers. These have a cumulative cost of goods sold increase that we all see as wasted tax dollars, but we create the albatross of bigger government. That is only one aspect...the other is black bag jobs and national and international security issues that come up with no notice that are not budgeted for. These "Projects" require massive funding and the source for these funds is existing budgets that have to arrive at the same bottom line after they have been the recipient of a clandestine tax. This results in everything having an "Adjusted" price which is what the press sees and runs with to the printer.

Scott

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/