|
Having run into a legal battle in a Virginia jurisdiction, directly associated with the wording in the recognizance signed by the bondsman, the magistrate and the defendant in the case… I am quite interested in trying to bring about a change in the clarity of the wording and placement of the liability for the bond and all the related conditions in proper perspective.
Having said all this… are there any other Virginia (I am not aware of the wording and/or problems in other states) bail bondsman that might be interested in trying to intact a clarity change in this confusing and potentially costly document that has the ability to “hang us out to dry”.
I am fighting a CA in Halifax county court at the present time that is trying to obtain forfeiture against me and the surety for conditions of conduct rather than appearance. (the defendant is in jail and did not miss a court date during his time on bond)
This is the motivating factor in my moving on this change. I wrote my local delegate and he referred me to DCJS… you know what good that will do if you have ever tried to deal with them… sorry, but that is the truth. Anyway, I am going to try and intact a change if I can “get r done”.
ANYONE INTERESTED IN WORKING FOR A CHANGE IN THIS DOCUMENT CAN EMAIL OR CALL ME.
CALL MY CELL PHONE AND YOU WILL GET ME PERSONALLY
I will give this a couple of weeks and if there is not a fair response I will still do it on my own… it would be nice if some of you would step up to the plate… this needs to be addressed. (My opinion only)
“I will not go quietly into the nite.”
_________________
Bill Marx, Sr.
"FREE STATE BAIL BONDS"
"FREE STATE INVESTIGATIONS"
DCJS: 99-176979
Cell: 434-294-0222
"Endeavor to Persevere" "Lone Watie"
"Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that , comes from bad judgment" "Will Rogers"
|
