| Fugitive Recovery Network (FRN) https://ftp.fugitiverecovery.com/forum/ | |
| NH Bail Enforcement https://ftp.fugitiverecovery.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=498 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | L.A.W. [ Wed 27 Oct 2004 16:52 ] |
| Post subject: | NH Bail Enforcement |
I received a telephone call advising me to check this Fugitive Recovery Network's 'Agent Directory' for persons advertising they are available for bail enforcement work in the state of New Hampshire but that they cannot legally perform such duties. Please... ladies and gentlemen... if you conduct bail enforcement activities within the State of New Hampshire be advised of RSA 597:7. You must be registered after proof of completing the required training and provide proof of a minimum of $300,000.00 liability insurance or be a NH licensed private detective. This also means one cannot legally enter the state and remove their skip even on out-of-state cases. If you get caught operating illegally here you will be arrested and prosecuted; as some have already learned the hard way. I would advise those who advertise they can conduct bail enforcement within the state of New Hampshire who cannot legally do so to remove their ad before they eventually get into some real difficulty they cannot deal with. My name is Lance Allen Wilkinson and I approve this message. |
|
| Author: | rex [ Thu 28 Oct 2004 08:07 ] |
| Post subject: | I Concur |
L.A.W., Many may not realize that your effort to start this thread is a tremendous service. With states enacting legislation concerning BE activities, my area of operation is shrinking, but that is why I have established contacts in other states. Many people do not know and therefore violate the law by coming into California to pick up an out-of-state skip without first complying with petition requirements. People, this trade of ours is in a constant state of flux where local laws are concerned, and blindly crossing state lines or working in your state without having all the facts is the proverbial recipe for disaster, in my opinion. Rex |
|
| Author: | HGUNNER [ Thu 28 Oct 2004 10:48 ] |
| Post subject: | LAWS |
BOTH REX AND LANCE ARE RIGHT THIS TRADE OF OURS IS IN A MAJOR STATE OF FLUX-UNTIL WE CAN GET FEDERAL LAW TO RECOGINIZE US I BELIEVE WE MUST CONSIDER HOW TO MAKE STATES LAWS WORK FOR US-SURE I CAN NOT GO TO CAL TO HUNT BUT WHY WOULD I?I HAVE REX AND ERIC ETC. TO DO THAT FOR ME(THEY KNOW THE AREA BETTER AND HAVE MORE CONTACTS ALSO).THEY CAN NOT HUNT HERE IN NH -MY TEAM HUNTS FOR THEM HERE-I CAN NOT GO TO TEXAS EITHER BUT I HAVE EXTENTED TEAM MEMBERS THERE ALSO.I ALSO US MICHAEL AND HIS GROUP(I ALSO CONSIDER THEM EXTENDED MEMBERS OF MY TEAM THEY HAVE EARNED MY RESPECT AND TRUST) I ALSO HAVE MADE CONTACTS ALL OVER THESE US STATES-THESE ARE PEOPLE I FEEL I CAN TRUST- I WILL ONLY WORK WITH LICENSED PEOPLE IN THEIR STATE-SO I SAY MAKE CONTACTS SPEAK TO YOUR CONTACTS GET TO HAVE A FEEL OF THERE EXPERTISE AND BACKROUND SHARE THE WEALTH BE FAIR YOU WILL STILL KEEP YOU BONDSMEN HAPPY AND YOU WILL GET A GREAT RETURN OF YOU INVESTMENT-BY THE WAY I HAVE GIVEN MY NAME AND BACKROUND TO ALOT OF ASSCIATIONS AND FUGITIVE RECOVERY GROUPS-I STILL USE THE PEOPLE I TALK TO BECAUSE I FORM A BOND WITH THEM AND SPEAK TO THEM IN PERSON NOT TAKE SOMEBODY ELSE ASSESMENT OF THERE SKILLS-MY FUTURE LIVING DEPENDS ON EACH CAPTURE AND SO DOES YOURS BE CAREFUL HAVE ANYBODY YOU SUBLET TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THEIR STATE LICENSE |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ | |