Fugitive Recovery Network (FRN) https://ftp.fugitiverecovery.com/forum/ | |
ATTN CALI PEOPLE: RE- SB 1384 https://ftp.fugitiverecovery.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=13319 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | SpanielPI [ Thu 31 May 2012 08:39 ] |
Post subject: | ATTN CALI PEOPLE: RE- SB 1384 |
Opposition LETTERS DUE BY 5PM TODAY - California Private Investigators - Please cut/paste the following letter on to your own company letterhead then fax it to the number provided at the bottom. Quote: *SUBJECT: SB 1384 (SIMITIAN): CONSUMER INFORMATION PRIVACY* * THIRD READING* * OPPOSE – AS AMEDNED MAY 15, 2012* Members, California State Senate As a licensed private investigator, I urge you to vote no on SB 1384 [Simitian] as amended May 15, 2012, which would allow “freezing” non-credit consumer reports that businesses rely upon to positively identify their customers and reduce the threat of fraud. *This bill would not prevent identity theft. *This bill purports to protect consumers by reducing the incidents of identity theft. Current law already allows “freezing” of *credit* reports which stops identity thieves from obtaining goods or services in another’s name. However, *non-credit consumer* reports are derived from public records, do not contain any credit-related information and are not used by thieves to steal goods or services in someone else’s name. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, one of the nation’s largest producers of no-credit consumer reports, *searched 22.9 million data points* and found *not one instance of an individual attempting to access another individual’s non-credit consumer report.* *This bill would take away an important fraud-reducing tool. *Non-credit consumer reports are used by retailers, non-profit organizations, lessors, insurers and other businesses to help positively confirm the identity of individuals seeking to do business with them. Freezing non-credit consumer reports would take away an important tool used to assess risk, like bogus insurance claims filed, evictions, Medicare/MediCAL scams, and other fraudulent behavior. Non-credit consumer reports are used to confirm an individual is not a fraudster impersonating someone else. Allowing freezes for accurate but adverse consumer histories would open a door to physical and financial risks to businesses, consumers, common tenants and co-workers. Allowing freezes of non-credit consumer reports would do nothing to protect consumers from identity theft. To the contrary, non-credit consumer reports are an important identification, risk assessment and fraud reducing tool used by businesses every day. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, I respectfully request that you *OPPOSE SB1384 (Simitian).* * * *______________________________* Signature ______________________________ Name [printed] Francie Koehler Special Circumstances CA PI 11539 510 3rd Street, # 101-D Oakland, CA 94607 510 844-2527 (ofc) 510 275-0355 (fax) |
Author: | tsuggs [ Thu 31 May 2012 09:03 ] |
Post subject: | Re: ATTN CALI PEOPLE: RE- SB 1384 |
They tried this same bill several years ago. I will pass the word around to bail agents also as we use credit headers to verify bail apps. At least I do. |
Author: | SpanielPI [ Thu 31 May 2012 09:49 ] |
Post subject: | Re: ATTN CALI PEOPLE: RE- SB 1384 |
Thanks Tony. The original message was posted in 1 of my other pi groups. I figured you might know her. |
Author: | docmike [ Thu 31 May 2012 12:15 ] |
Post subject: | Re: ATTN CALI PEOPLE: RE- SB 1384 |
Didnt even know about that bill. Talk about messing up safe bail writes. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |