New Jersey Again... • PUBLIC SECTION • Open Discussion • Fugitive Recovery Network (FRN) Forums
FRN Banner
wordpress-ad





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: New Jersey Again...
 Post Posted: Thu 10 Nov 2005 13:42 
Offline
in memoriam
User avatar

Joined: Sat 07 Jun 2003 13:51
Posts: 705
Location: New England
State attorney: Bounty hunters out of bounds
Thursday, November 10, 2005
By JOSEPH DEE
Staff Writer
TRENTON - Bounty hunters have no police powers and are not entitled to smash down the doors of private residences in pursuit of bail jumpers, a New Jersey deputy attorney general said yesterday.

Asked if four agents from Tri-State Fugitive Investigations overstepped their authority when they broke into a house on Passaic Street on Monday morning in search of fugitive Dion Duncan, Deputy Attorney General Lori Linskey said simply, "Yes."

The case has sparked wide interest in part because Chaos, the pit bull owned by the couple who rent the house, ran out the front door during the commotion of the raid and remains missing.

It also is shining light on the murky legal standing of fugitive recovery agents, or bounty hunters, who often pursue fugitives independently of local police.

On Monday, Jack Furlong, an attorney who represents ABC Bail Bonds Inc., the Morrisville, Pa., company that hired the bounty hunters who broke into the Passaic Street house, said, "The law is that fugitive recovery agent, armed with active warrants, may enter private residences provided they act in good faith."

Linskey said bail bonds and fugitive recovery companies pin their authority on a 19th century U.S. Supreme Court case. "Bounty hunters try to point to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling - the 1873 Taylor v. Taintor case - from a time when we didn't even have organized police departments.

"We do not believe that Supreme Court case from the 1800s gives bail bondsmen or fugitive recovery agents any police power whatsoever," Linskey said.

Furlong disagreed, but conceded that questions over the authority of bounty hunters are debated nationwide.

"I understand her position, but the bail bond industry as a whole believes that the U.S. Supreme Court opinion is not repudiated by an opinion by the (New Jersey) Appellate Division of Superior Court.

"This is a raging controversy nationwide, the power of the bounty hunter," Furlong said, "because government is speaking with two voices on this subject. (Linskey) has a 2003 opinion stating fugitive recovery agents enjoy no special privileges, and I have an appellate division opinion that says, when deciding how much money to give back to a bail bond company, the first question is, `Did you get the fugitive and how aggressively did you look for him?' "

Linskey said bounty hunters ought to act in concert with local police.

Brenda Livingston, who rents the Passaic Street home with her boyfriend, Darryl Hardee, has accused the bounty hunters hired by ABC of stealing two rings and $750 in cash during their fruitless search of the couple's three- story house Monday morning.

Furlong has denied that Tri-State Fugitive Investigations agents seized any personal property during their attempt to capture bail jumper Duncan.

State Sen. Shirley Turner, D-Lawrence, said bounty hunters leave themselves open to such charges when they break into a house without police accompaniment. Trenton police officers were not present when four Tri-State agents raided the house at 8 a.m.

Turner said she will push for legislation that requires bail bondsmen and bounty hunters to be licensed and that makes it clear they do not have the authority to break into private residences.

"It's just wrong. I can't believe somebody can do that," said Livingston's mother, New Brunswick resident Kathleen Reitano. "I thought they would have to come with a sheriff's officer or somebody. This is the United States, not Iraq."

Meanwhile, the bounty hunters who came up empty-handed Monday got their man yesterday around dawn.

Furlong said fugitive recovery agents located and arrested Duncan by staking out Livingston's and Hardee's house. The couple have acknowledged that Duncan is a friend. ABC has been seeking Duncan for about a year after posting two bonds totaling $4,000 to spring him from jail, Furlong said.

"Darryl Hardee was observed leaving the residence in a dark-colored SUV," Furlong said. "At approximately 6 a.m. he arrived at 424 Martin Luther King Boulevard. He got out of his car, made a cell phone call and knocked on the door. Dion Duncan and another male walked out. All three men were dressed in construction work clothes. The fugitive recovery team approached the house and took Duncan into custody."

Trenton police confirmed Duncan was in custody last night and was being held on an out-of-town warrant and because he was wanted by the Mercer County Sheriff's Department.

Livingston disputed Furlong's account of Duncan's capture, saying she and Hardee remained in bed until 7:30 a.m. "We brought the kids to school, we brought a neighbor to the unemployment office and then we visited our attorney," she said.

Patrick Whalen of the law firm Lord & Whalen said he is representing the Passaic Street couple. An ABC Bail Bonds official has made repeated attempts to contact the couple, he said. Livingston said she was treated rudely when she went to the ABC office on South Broad Street on Monday, but since then an official there has been "trying to sweet-talk me."

"Clearly it went from treating them in a derogatory and degrading fashion to countless phone calls apologizing," Whalen said. "They're represented by counsel now, and their inquiries should come through me."

Furlong said Tri-State agents acted lawfully when they broke into Livingston and Hardee's house. They were acting on a tip that Duncan was sleeping there, he said.

"If Lord & Whalen file a suit against Tri-State and ABC, we will fight them until Hell freezes over and then we'll fight them on the ice," Furlong said.

"I think the primary concern that has been raised to me by the family is that something has to be done to hold these entities accountable," Whalen said in reference to ABC Bail Bonds and Tri-State.

The companies are separate entities but seem to share the same office and possibly even some personnel, he said. There "appears to be a pattern of problems" at the companies, he said. He is representing an Atlanta man who is suing suing ABC and Tri-State for mistakenly arresting him in Georgia on March 9, 2004, and transporting him here. NOTE: Contact Joseph Dee at jdee@njtimes.com or (609) 989-5704.

_________________
Lance Allen Wilkinson
Recoveries by L.A.W.
Serving since 1984
“What is sought is found... what is overlooked escapes” (Oedipus Rex)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Thu 10 Nov 2005 16:45 
Offline
in memoriam

Joined: Tue 25 Nov 2003 15:56
Posts: 290
Location: Nederland, TX
This case is going to be VERY interesting to follow!

_________________
Steve Hedrick
Hedrick & Associates INVESTIGATIVE GROUP
Nederland, TX
TX PI LIC #A-09665
(409) 284-1895
http://360.yahoo.com/ftachaser357
"For every DEFENDANT that fails to appear in Court, there is a VICTIM seeking Justice"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri 11 Nov 2005 11:07 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2004 16:44
Posts: 993
This could be the start of the government intrusion in our work we have been talking about now for awhile.


Last edited by HoundDog on Fri 11 Nov 2005 12:37, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: NJ problems
 Post Posted: Fri 11 Nov 2005 12:04 
Offline
in memoriam

Joined: Sun 30 Mar 2003 19:43
Posts: 774
I believe this will result in licensing in NJ not really a bad thing --many many yahoo and cowboys in nj and pa this should eliminate some real a-holes--remember us recovery bureau is in passic nj pumping out 3 day wonders as fast as possible--I do not think this will creat a federal mess yet--ny has taken their problem in hand by aggressivly arresting unlicensed bounty hunters--if we can get the east in check i believe the rest of the country will follow and the situation will quite down.We need to approch the feds with our ideas not some liberal jerk o-f ideas--remember pds and feds also screw up.the public winds up paying for their screw ups in tax dollars.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri 11 Nov 2005 13:12 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2004 16:44
Posts: 993
I agree with you Hadley, I think that all states should have some form or another of licensing and or training. This would eliminate alot of the 3-day wonders.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri 11 Nov 2005 13:24 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun 16 Jan 2005 11:40
Posts: 966
Location: New Jersey
FRN Agency ID #: 1208
Experience: More than 10 years
I agree with Hadley on licensing agents in N J but not with the all the restrictions their going to impose. The findings and conclusion of the latest incident here will of course prove very interesting, but in reality N J will not recognize T vs T and seems to want complete control of the industry.
As Mr Furlong stated, the goverment is speaking "two voices" which is absolutely correct but the problem here is we have no unity and the lack of money to defend ourselves against a goverment that will eventually have it their way. This will hurt the industry here in N J and whatever state that follows not recognizing T vs T.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: t vs t
 Post Posted: Fri 11 Nov 2005 14:10 
Offline
in memoriam

Joined: Sun 30 Mar 2003 19:43
Posts: 774
Even mass recoginized t vs t approx 3 months ago - i believe it will happen in nj or surety bail will cease to exsist--if that occured in nj your taxes would go up like a sky rocket and you would be building jails on every corner in the state-just imagine jersey city , trenton ,hoboken and newark all with no surety bail jails would overfollow in a ny minute-it is my belief that even the pds would be overwhelmed---again licensing is needed training is needed --all nj beas go out and speak to your reps support a bill that forces licensing and training--get proactive before the liberals take over the discussion and your voice will never be heard


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri 11 Nov 2005 16:59 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005 08:57
Posts: 566
Location: Evansville, Indiana
This actually may be the case which reinforces T vs T. If the the court rules in favor of T v T then that will solidify our powers. Should the lower court rule in favor than I am sure they will appeal it all the way up to the supreme court. Should that happen and IF the supreme court rules in favor of T v T then it will have to be enforced in all states of the union. Many states are getting away with ignoring it because of the age of the ruling... if there is a current ruling in favor of T v T then it will have to be nationally recognized.

The states will still have power to REGULATE (meaning the requirements for becoming a BEA) but once a person is licensed in any state of the union then that license will have to be good in all states.

The kicker is that it HAS to go to the US supreme court. It doens't matter if individual states are recognizing T v T. It will take a new US supreme court ruling in order for all states to be forced into recognizing it.

I hope indeed that this gentleman is true to his word about fighting them untill hell freezes over, and then on the ice.

Perhaps we could contact them and maybe start a fundraising for the legal battle on the condition that they take it all the way.

_________________
-The Solution-
Indiana Agency #: PI20700211
Indiana Notary Public - Exp: 12/20/13

"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong. That is your oath."
- Kingdom of Heaven


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri 11 Nov 2005 17:29 
Offline
in memoriam

Joined: Tue 25 Nov 2003 15:56
Posts: 290
Location: Nederland, TX
This case could have re-enforce T-vs-T, IF the Skip was inside the residence, he was not.

_________________
Steve Hedrick
Hedrick & Associates INVESTIGATIVE GROUP
Nederland, TX
TX PI LIC #A-09665
(409) 284-1895
http://360.yahoo.com/ftachaser357
"For every DEFENDANT that fails to appear in Court, there is a VICTIM seeking Justice"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri 11 Nov 2005 17:50 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005 08:57
Posts: 566
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Police serve warrants all the time and the fugitive is not where they think it was. T v T recognizes the power of the bail agent as that of a "sherriff".

It's going to rely if they actually acted in "good faith" and had probable cause to believe the fugitive was home (also if he was getting mail there then that would constitute as being his "home" and faill even more into the literal ruling in T v T).

This thread is very similiar in discussion to the Florida thread where we were discussion the wording of the ruling. In this case we are awaiting a ruling.

_________________
-The Solution-
Indiana Agency #: PI20700211
Indiana Notary Public - Exp: 12/20/13

"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong. That is your oath."
- Kingdom of Heaven


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

FRN Forums » PUBLIC SECTION » Open Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 261 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Fugitive Recovery Network

FRN Forum
Login
Forum
Register
Forum FAQ


Advertise on FRN



ad_here_1